The difference between Right and Wrong is simply a function
of the distance in conscious space covered during a period of time in which the
consideration is manifested in ones’ awareness as they travel at some "moral"
velocity along a trajectory established by the a priori knowledge of actions
and consequences. It is uncertain
therefore where in a continuum of conscious space and time one will be, when an
established point in time is selected for an evaluation of relative right and
wrong. And it could be supposed that
until the wave form collapse of all possibilities occurs, one could be both
simultaneously right and wrong, but with no quantifiable degree of certainty.
It therefore follows that the finer the distinction between
popular opinions of right and wrong, the less distance would could potentially
cover during a period of consideration, and therefore we might expect the
certainty of being right or wrong to increase as the distinctions grow finer,
but the space between the two opposites is infinitely divisible, and therefore
a measurement of proximity to a polarity is meaningless, because the polarities
never converge. Like a snapshot of a
ball in flight, which yields no information about velocity or trajectory, such
is an evaluation of right and wrong within a snapshot of a context in which
there is no information about the before and after……
No comments:
Post a Comment