On the Seeming Necessity to Write Very Long Passages when Discussing Very Complicated Things

On the Necessity to Write Very Long Passages when Discussing Very Complicated Things

Here is a Test, or possibly a Game concerning our subject at hand. 

There is only one objective:  Establish whether or not the following outline of statements contains any Truth.

A)     Very Complicated Things demand Very Long Explanations

B)      Very Long Explanations can transform Things into Very Complicated Things

C)      No Author is Capable of properly Explaining Very Complicated Things in ways that are not Very Long.

D)     The demand for “Responsative Explanatory Lengthitude” is not necessarily inherent to the essence of Very Complicated Things.

E)      Most Authors possess an Exceedingly large amount of Capabilistic Shortitude and are only able to produce Very long Explanations to Very Complicated things.

F)      In a closed system of Authors with varying degrees of Capability, it is generally the belief that Belongitude is a literary function of Explanatory Discourse Lengthitude.

G)     The “Long Way Around” cannot be improved upon by any known Practice of Shortitudinal Navigation when plotting a route through the murky waters of Academic Discourse

Bonus points, useful for tie-breakers, etc., will be awarded to anyone who can identify any word from the above passage that does not have at least one pre-existing public citation, reference, or simple example of usage.