This is my blog so I will rant if I want to, even though I am ranting about my own mistake....
So I was reading today about the hottest new theory about the plane disappearance. It seems to be that some aviation "enthusiast" posted to his blog a theory that a second plane was involved. By flying very close to the missing plane, they appeared as one normal radar blip. I had an email exchange with a few people on 3/13 about this concept, and went into quite a bit of detail. What I did NOT do unfortunately is update my own blog with this concept (if I hadn't been rebuilding a car engine for 30 hours straight, I almost certainly would have updated this posting.....but sometimes rebuilding engines is a higher priority than getting your original thoughts into the public domain in a timely manner). This aviation enthusiast posted his description of the same scenario to his blog on 3/17. Let this be a lesson to all you kids at home: timestamp + public domain = credible citation of originality....
PS: I did attempt to
post my theory in response to a LinkedIn article, but the as I recall, the
website froze and my comment was not saved to the website. This likely happened because 5,000 people
were adding their fascinating thoughts like, “OMG, I didn’t know that 777 was
an area code for the location of missing airplanes”. So I got close to getting the theory posted
on the 13th, but I was not playing with horseshoes or hand grenades (at
least as far as you know…and that’s all I’m saying about the possibility that I
can in fact multi-task)
No comments:
Post a Comment